26 Comments
User's avatar
Stop the pricks's avatar

I am sure once we get judges that have integrity, he will finally face all the crimes he has committed. What a disgusting person- just like so many politicians.

Expand full comment
Gilgamech's avatar

Go get him girl!

Expand full comment
Born Again's avatar

"It’s time for Pam Bondi or Kash Patel to go after the easiest takedown of a criminal in our country. And I have all the receipts they need."<----Susan, you GO girl!!!

Expand full comment
Viral's avatar

You were caught by your "husband" servicing crack whores and their pimps, for their leftovers. Which is what actually killed him (along your strychnine cookies).

Get over it! And stop eating the pets in Springfield.

Expand full comment
PrsctNative's avatar

Up until the jabs were perpetrated on America, Obama’s grift was the worst abuse of laws instituted to protect citizens in recent decades. Now the brain fog and dementia caused by the jabs has further dumbed down Americans to where personal agenda supersedes due process. Orwell and Huxley were prophets.

Expand full comment
Judy K. Zamlen-Spotts's avatar

This has to be addressed nationally, someone needs to speak up in the media and bring attention to this issue. There’s a reason why they’re not addressing this, and it must be very frightening.

Expand full comment
The Liberator's avatar

Brilliant! Now, where are Pam Bondi and our legislators? We need OFFICIAL actions brought against this criminal couple. Republican legislators are cowards. Look at what the Democrats did to Trump, and he was INNOCENT!! They're STILL saying he's a "convicted felon"! Come on, cowardly Republicans. Bet your damn job just once in your pathetic career.

Expand full comment
Will B's avatar

I am not a fan of Santos and glad that he has been sentenced, but this process has to be fair all across the board. We had Obama become president based on lies about his social number, birth certificate, and even the gender of his wife.

Expand full comment
Erin Montgomery's avatar

Hope you have duplicated and separately stored your information in many places or with confidential friends. It’s a gold mine I’m sure!

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

Thanks, yes I have.

Expand full comment
George Garfinkel's avatar

We can only hope

Expand full comment
mary's avatar

You go girl!! I appreciate your faithfulness in pursuing this fraud!! Dear God…. Bring the sunlight!! Expose the evil!

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

Thank you, Mary.

Expand full comment
Ted's avatar

Have a question and figured you would know, based on your research what is his legal name? Didn't go by Barry Soetoro for a time?

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

Only for four years (aged 6 to 10) when he was living with his mother in Indonesia.

Expand full comment
Michael Srite's avatar

Good work, Susan. However, could it be possible the reason for eliminating the geographical motif from SSNs was they were running out of available numbers in fast growing states, say Florida, while there were still plenty of them in Wyoming, for example?

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

No, the last time I looked it up, they still have enough combinations to issue as many as already have been issued.

Expand full comment
Michael Srite's avatar

I agree they have plenty of numbers now, but I asked ChatGPT and it said the randomizing scheme was adopted for two reasons: security--to make it harder for malicious actors to predict or guess what a person's number might be, and to reduce the risk of exhausting available numbers.

By the way, Chat also reported the SSA quit recycling numbers in 2011. I'm not arguing Obama got a recycled SSN, but that's what I'd expect him to say. That wouldn't explain what he was doing in Connecticut, though.

Please keep on with this. At the least it should cause Obama some consternation and embarrassment.

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

That’s not true. They did it to muddy the waters. Of course, they are going to have a lie. The numbers used were half of what the government still had. They NEVER reissued numbers. Don’t trust Chat for information. It’s like Snopes. He was never in Connecticut.

Expand full comment
Michael Srite's avatar

It sure is muddy, and fishy. Supposedly, Obama's mother applied for his SSN in 1961, in Hawaii, when he was about six months old. I was around back then and I can say this would've been highly unusual. Typically, youngsters back then applied for their own SSNs at the post office when they were teenagers and began working jobs subject to income tax. I don't know if it was even allowed in those days for a person to apply for a SSN for a kid who didn't need it. It was not required of parents to report a child's SSN for dependent purposes on tax returns until much later, when the government got tired of people claiming their dogs or non-existant children as dependants.

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

No, she did not. At that time, no one had to get an SSN until they got their first job. He would have gotten a Hawaiian number when he got the job at Baskin-Robbins when he was fifteen.

Expand full comment
Michael Srite's avatar

Yep, sounds about right by my experience.

By now the DOGE boys should've uncovered Obama's legit SSN, but watch, nothing will happen. Some people think he set up the Kamala fiasco to help Trump win. Since Obama has been playing a big role in Democratic operations and may be considered a Trump enemy, wasnt it remarkable how chatty and friendly the two were at Jimmy Carter's funeral? As George Carlin said: "It's all a big club, and you ain't in it!"

Expand full comment
Laura Lyman's avatar

These dates don’t add up if the Social Security number was issued in 1977 then how did the Connecticut resident that was born in 1890 get the Social Security number?

Maybe you need to proofreader

starting in his mid-20s, when he stole the Social Security number of a Connecticut resident born in 1890. The number, which started with 042, was originally issued on March 28, 1977, to a resident of that state. When the Social Security system went into effect in 1936, those numbers were

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

Try reading it again. All you questions are answered.

Expand full comment
Laura Lyman's avatar

OK way back then the 042 was issued, because I know in 1962 they were issuing 049, thank you

Expand full comment
Susan Daniels's avatar

Connecticut went from 040 to 049 as the beginning numbers. SSNs were issued to the address where people lived when they applied for them. Obama was fifteen and living in HI when the number he uses was issued. He did not start using it until he was in his mid-20s.

Expand full comment